Showing posts with label texas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label texas. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

City Council Meeting, 730p Regular Session

Direct link to .pdf Agenda

A few items from tonight's meeting:

  • (9) Zoning change for Bethel Road Estates to allow for stucco and to allow an additional detached, 2 story residential structure at 256 West Bethel Road
  • (10) Amendment for "Rules for computing number of parking spaces"
  • (11) Amendment to revise the existing definition of "Outside Storage and Display--Retail Stores:  Retail Stores and Shops:" to include additional screening requirements
  • (14) adopting the '09 - '10 Budget
  • (15) approval of ad valorem taxes
Two items of interest:
  • (12) Resolution, outlining the terms and conditions of a debt service funding plan
  • (13) Consider approval of the written Fund Balance policy of the City of Coppell
Will be interesting to hear the discussion about a debt service funding plan and policy.

Follow updates on Twitter tonight at www.twitter.com/concerncoppell
Facebook group is located here

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Opinion - Former Coppell Mayor Mark Wolfe

Submitted from Former Coppell Mayor, Mark Wolfe after 8/29/09 Dallas Morning News article Coppell weighs tax increase for North Lake land debt


The Truth about Coppell and Taxes

The citizens of Coppell have been put in a hard dilemma. Some present and past city leaders had to be tough and show Lucy Billingsley and the Billingsley Corporation who was “boss” over the controversial Cypress Waters development at Northlake. In the end, the citizens of Coppell get to pay $26 million in land debt, only the first of more debt for the Northlake development. This is after the city and school district spent well over $2 million in legal fees. And in the end, Lucy Billingsley gets to build her dream, Cypress Waters, with even less dollars than originally projected. The citizens of Coppell are just now realizing the total story.

I had the privilege to meet privately with Lucy Billingsley two times during the negotiations of Northlake between Billingsley Corporation and Coppell. Both times were lengthy and pleasant meetings. The first meeting was at the beginning of the controversy of Northlake and Ms. Billingsley repeated several times in her willingness to work with Coppell, her desire to be a good neighbor, grant land for Coppell schools, etc. The second meeting was months later. By that point she had long realized that Coppell did not want to work together and while the City of Coppell and the Coppell ISD had spent over $2 million in legal fees attempting to block her development, she knew in the end that she would prevail. She had the favor of the City of Dallas, the Texas courts and Texas law on her side. Coppell’s actions between these two meetings had been disappointing at best. A former city leader told two African-American Dallas City Councilmen that the city did not need to negotiate with Dallas since these two councilmen would soon be in jail anyway over alleged crimes. Rarely did the minority members of the Dallas City Council vote with the then Mayor Laura Miller. But Coppell’s attitude prompted a Dallas City Council unanimous vote in favor of Billingsley and against Coppell. The local Coppell newspapers rarely, if at all, reported such incidents. Stories such as this could be found in The Dallas Observer and the Dallas Morning News.

So Lucy Billingsley decided to wait it out, knowing that in the end she would prevail. But the final outcome could not have been sweeter for Billingsley. Coppell paid millions for land and a lake that they do not need and will eventually remove a power plant – all on land that is in the City of Dallas, and all at the expense of the Coppell taxpayers. Lucy, well, she gets to build her 10,000 unit development complete with all Dallas city services and Coppell schools at Coppell taxpayer cost.

The saddest part of this commentary is that the vast majority of citizens never had the opportunity to view the original or current proposal of Cypress Waters. Lucy Billingsley came two times to my company and met with my agents and shared her vision and dream. Most of the agents were impressed. I think most of Coppell could have been as well before the need to spend over $26 million for a land purchase that we may never use.

Now, the City Council wants to raise taxes five cents to pay for the first of several bonds for Northlake. And they are seeking this increase with no fiscal cuts, no staff decrease (even if through attrition) and a huge overage in the city’s fund balance. Today, Coppell has a bloated city government with 2.5 times more employees at 40,000 population than we had at 25,000 population in the mid 1990s.

Something is terribly wrong with this picture. That is why the citizens of Coppell are finally saying, “No New Taxes".

Mark Wolfe

Next Coppell Public Hearing

Tuesday, September 1st, 6:00 pm

Coppell City Hall




Article in the Dallas Morning News


Print
RSS
Yahoo! Buzz
Social Bookmarking

Coppell weighs tax increase for North Lake land debt

10:53 PM CDT on Saturday, August 29, 2009

By BRANDON FORMBY / The Dallas Morning News
bformby@dallasnews.com

The Coppell City Council is considering raising residents' property tax rate as much as 5 cents – but the city isn't in financial straits.

City services aren't being threatened. Staffers aren't facing pink slips. And the general fund has a healthy surplus.

The council is trying to figure out the best way to begin paying down $26.5 million in bond debt from the purchase of land outside the city limits. It's the same land that voters overwhelmingly approved buying in 2006.

"The only reason there's a question about raising taxes on the table is the North Lake debt service," City Manager Clay Phillips said.

Almost everyone on the council agrees that at some point the city will have to raise taxes to pay down the debt. Some favor phasing in a five-cent increase over two years.

The question at ongoing council meetings is whether to increase taxes this year as residents muddle through a historic recession – especially when their past tax contributions have created a $10 million general fund surplus that is not currently earmarked for other expenditures.

The council is to have a public hearing on the matter Tuesday. It's scheduled to vote on the final rate on Sept. 8.

At last Tuesday's public hearing, more than 150 residents packed the council chambers to show their disdain for higher taxes. Many wore T-shirts that said, "No new taxes."

But some residents say it's not just a possible tax increase that has them stirred up. They say a majority of council members haven't publicly discussed the matter enough.

They wonder whether the issue would be on the table if the next council election wasn't more than 18 months away. And they accuse officials of making up their minds before hearing from residents.

Talks of a recall effort have already begun.

North Lake is just north of LBJ Freeway, connected to Coppell by a small strip of land. But the property borders Coppell and Irving and is mostly in the Coppell school district. Coppell and its school district bought parcels of the land as part of settlement agreements stemming from their opposition to long-held plans for development in the area.

The city issued about $26.5 million in bonds last year to buy about 468 acres, all but about 100 acres of which is lake acreage. The annual payments for the debt are about $2.8 million.

Mayor Jayne Peters wants to hold off at least a year before raising taxes.

"With these economic times, do we need to be raising the tax rate?" she said. "Based on the fund balance, we can afford to absorb it."

But Peters will only get to vote on the matter if there's a tie. And so far, only council member Marvin Franklin has publicly voiced opposition to raising taxes.

The current tax rate is 64.146 cents per $100 of assessment, which amounts to a tax bill of about $1,603.65 for a $250,000 home.

According to a budget memo presented to the council earlier this summer, the tax rate at some point will have to go up to 69.146 cents per $100 of value to service the debt. That's an increase of about $125, or 7.8 percent, for a $250,000 home.

Print|RSS||Yahoo! Buzz|Send a news tip

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Pictures from the City Council Meeting, 8/25





www.flickr.com








K. Todd Storch's City of Coppell - No New Taxes photosetK. Todd Storch's City of Coppell - No New Taxes photoset



Last Night's City Council Meeting/Public Hearing - Part 2

READ PART 1 HERE

The Public Hearings were now closed and it was time to hear from our elected officials.

I wish I had a transcript of this discussion, but I just don't have the time to go back and listen to the live feed (anyone interested in taking on that project for me???? nudge nudge!!).

What I was able to do was use the Twitter account to provide live feedback. If you don't know about Twitter, I highly recommend you sign up, get a free account and follow @concerncoppell. If that is too much to do, then just save the website bookmark and read frequently.

Billy Faught was the first to speak and he thanked everyone for taking time out of their day and evening to join in this discussion. The citizen's didn't seem to care for his comment Faught: I'm not sure where to go from here. This was a forum for the citizens to discuss. I agree w many of you that this is a hard time
Mayor Peters then closed down the meeting with these comments:



Some final thoughts I have about last night probably could be summed up by a short conversation I had with a local Coppell newspaper Citizens Advocate's Editor, Jean Murph.

She was sitting next to me at the back of the room and asked me something like, was I happy with Monday night's budget workshop meeting?

My response was something like, 'well, I wouldn't say I was happy about it because all of City Council didn't flush out the final issues that taxes didn't need to be raised next year.'

Then, and this is where it became clear to me why I've been passionate about getting involved with our Municipal government....Ms. Murph asked me why I didn't feel like this issue had been discussed properly, because tonight was the first Public Hearing to do just that.

Reflecting on this question last night and this morning, it hit me that if the citizen's of Coppell hadn't been informed, hadn't had good discussion before Tuesday night's meeting, there was a good chance their voices could not have been heard.

Yes, the City of Coppell does post all of the public meetings on their website the way they need to, but information travels in ways that isn't just one way and as busy as most people are with school starting, there is only so much you can keep up with about every detail.

In fact, that is why we elect City Council members to do this work for us. To keep up with the issues, to understand all the details and represent us.

So my thoughts have come down to a few questions and statements:

If last night was the first Public Hearing...the first night that City Council could hear from the people that elected them, why did Council Member Brancheau say there was an agreement after Monday night's special budget workshop meeting with at least 4 City Council members to raise taxes?

Was the decision to raise taxes going to be made without any public input from the Public Hearings?

Did last night's meeting matter to the majority of our City Council?

What if only a few citizen's were at last night's meeting and didn't know about this until after it was voted and passed on September 8th?

Thank you Marvin Franklin and Mayor Peters for your thought process about next year's taxes.

If it isn't necessary to raise them next year, why would they be raised?

It seems that our Councilmember's need to realize and appreciate public opinion. This type of debate is healthy and necessary to keep the interests of our City at the forefront.

If any City Council members were aggravated or irritated about the amount of people in the room or the applause for speakers opposing a tax rate increase or the freedom to wear a T-Shirt that say's "No New Taxes", then I would ask those City Council members why chose to be elected and why they choose to serve our city and our citizens.

This is one man's opinion, but after speaking and hearing from so many of you, I know I am not alone.

The next Public Hearing is September 1st at 6p. Be there.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

City Council Votes, Unanimous FOR Manara

City Council has voted
FOR = for the rezoning for Manara Acadamy
AGAINST = denying the rezoning SUP for Manara Acadamy

Marvin Franklin, Council/PL6: FOR

Billy Faught/Council/PL5: FOR

Marsha Tunnell, Council/PL4: FOR

Brianna Hinojosa - Flores, Council/PL3: FOR

Bob Mahlik, Council/PL2: FOR

Tim Brancheau, Council/PL1: FOR

**edited with addition***
Karen Hunt, Mayor Pro-Tem/PL7: FOR